![quarkxpress 2015 el capitan quarkxpress 2015 el capitan](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n9PpOeAcWd8/Vex6w2kVhBI/AAAAAAAAJh0/t8dV11caTV8/s500/QuarkXPress.2015.v11.1.0.Multilingual.Incl.Keymaker-CORE-www.intercambiosvirtuales.org-02.png)
Quarkxpress 2015 el capitan software#
I haven’t got everything I wanted yet, but I’ve got more of what I wanted from this software release than any release of any other software I’ve seen before-probably because this is the first time anybody asked me what I wanted. Others wanted an improvement to footnotes. I wanted colour transformations in Open Type so I could use the Chartwell fonts. It’s done very simply by Facebook polling. The key new features, HTML5 and native vector conversion, are probably driven more by business need than by user requests, but most of the rest have been prioritised based on what people said they wanted. You may or may not want that, but it’s an example of the phenomenal responsiveness I’ve experienced. “Let me publish HTML web-apps, you know, the kind that were all the rage when the iPhone first came out before native apps did.” The kind of thing, for example, that we’re seeing increasingly with Hive and IFTT.Įighteen months later, HTML5 publishing does exactly that-exactly, even down to the level that you can prepare your app for HTML5 publishing, put it out there, and have the App Studio version available later without having to recode. “What do you think we should do, then?” she said. Actually, I can think of a few clients now who would be best off pursuing that route, but that’s what I said at the time. I told her I thought it looked really good, but it was far too expensive and I couldn’t imagine any client ever wanting to fork out for it. App Studio makes smartphone and tablet native apps from Quark documents. About eighteen months ago, someone rang me up from Quark (long before I got involved with them) and asked me what I thought of their App Studio. This goes through to the new features themselves. Even so, the willingness to help, sort out problems, give advice and generally make it fun if quite unparalleled. Obviously this doesn’t always happen, especially not for feature requests, and there are still people who are insisting that the one feature they need has to be the next one implemented. On occasion I’ve seen bugs reported by users and fixed by Quark’s engineers on the same day. It’s quite unlike any other commercial Facebook group (or forum) I’ve ever been part of. Half the posts are by users, and half the posts are by Quark’s own team, including developers, quality controllers, and the guy in charge of the whole QuarkXPress outfit. I have to say that I never really engaged with Quark as an organisation back in the 2000s when this was supposed to be the case, except occasional contact when I upgraded. (I see from my account that I have been upgrading since 1997.) A year ago, though, I joined Quark’s Facebook group.
![quarkxpress 2015 el capitan quarkxpress 2015 el capitan](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vgROw2fjyCs/maxresdefault.jpg)
![quarkxpress 2015 el capitan quarkxpress 2015 el capitan](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/QuarkXPress_34.jpg)
Maybe you’re saying it needed to be: Quark did have the reputation of being aloof, even arrogant. Quark the company is exceptionally responsive to its users. The Quark interface has always run quicker than InDesign’s, but that’s not what I mean here. The thing is, it isn’t Quark’s new features that take it right past Adobe InDesign. There may also be an HTML5 version coming… If you want to know what they are, you could do worse than buy my book: Desk Top Publishing with QuarkXPress 2016. Heck, if you desperately want to know and can’t afford to buy the book, email me and I’ll let you have a look at the PDF. QuarkXPress 2016 has a lot of other new features. Combine it with Flixels or other looping video stills, and you have something that will bring people back again and again. The point is that print suddenly goes Harry Potter-like those photographs which people wander in and out of. You can put any audio on, but pristine audio recorded in a studio (even a home studio, with proper equipment and sound-damping) will help to perfect it, whereas substandard audio or (worse) a standard audio track that everyone knows will dissolve the magic. Of course, like all things interactive, the magic comes when you develop specific resources that make the most of it. You can turn it into an interactive one in about half an hour. You can turn a relatively simple print publication into a web-app for the iPad, other tablets or smartphones in about six clicks. But the result has always been clunky, sub-standard, not quite right. It’s been tried before, in a number of ways. For the first time, we can create seamless HTML5 apps straight from desktop publishing software. You may have seen my post before about conversion to native objects. It’s been my great privilege to work with the Quark team as one of their testers in the weeks leading up to it.